Still think bigger is better?

I’ve experienced investment management from the investment team of a firm with $800 billion under management and another with $47 billion under management, and I can say with confidence to anyone thinking that bigger is better, you’re fooling yourself.  Many firms rely upon people thinking that way to attract clients and build barriers between themselves and smaller asset managers, but it’s time investors understood the facts.  I know it seems counterintuitive, but if investments are managed properly, size offers no advantages and, in fact, creates many disadvantages from a client’s perspective.

The argument that size matters involves a collection of incorrect notions: that access to the best products and strategies can only be obtained by the biggest and most powerful firms, that the largest firms have some kind of monopoly on investment wisdom, that teams manage money better than individuals, that big firms have better analytical tools and infrastructure that afford significant advantages to client portfolios, that your money is safer at big firms, that large research staffs are needed to understand everything as well as it needs to be understood for investment purposes.  But none of these are accurate.

Today to think that more is better is actually like continuing to think that the earth is flat. Facing problems like being overweight in America is a cultural issue that requires changing our concept of what is best. For this reason, according to the keto x3 reviews, the need to consume medications for weight loss purposes is essential in a treatment that really seeks to obtain results in a reasonable period of time.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.